Making Democracy Work

Because Democracy Is Not A Spectator Sport

The League of Women Voters is a nonpartisan political organization encouraging informed and active participation in government. It influences public policy through education and advocacy.

Welcome to the League of Women Voters of Arizona

Donate

Welcome to the website of the League of Women Voters of Arizona. We hope your visit will help you better understand the League and your government. Our focus on the issues and on encouraging true government of the people has earned the League its reputation as a respected and effective participant in the american political process in an era of proliferating and powerful special interests. The League's advocacy of the public interest is increasingly recognized as an essential voice of democracy. Please join us in our mission of being a Voice For Citizens - A Force For Change.

The League of Women of Arizona does not endorse the contents of any websites to which it links; such Internet addresses contain information not posted by the League and are included to provide convenient access to additional information. The League does not endorse or control these external Internet addresses nor guarantees the accuracy of such addresses.

Join us on Facebook

Find us on Facebook

ACROSS THE STATE

Election law H2305: The Protect your Right to Vote coalition turned in 146,028 signatures to get this on the ballot. This will put the law on hold until the 2014 election. Key provisions were: Limiting who can take someone's early ballot to a polling place; Setting up procedures to stop sending early ballots to voters who haven't used them; Imposing stricter requirements on citizen groups proposing their own laws through initiatives;Require minor party candidates to get as many signatures to qualify as Republicans or Democrats despite their much smaller voter registration. Members of the LWV passed petitions on this.
H2196 was then passed which repealed H2305.The governor signed this so it is off the ballot.

Abortion Rights: AZ had a petition pending before the U.S. Supreme Court challenging the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision striking down the legislature's 20-week abortion restrictions, Horne v. Issacson (13-402). On January 14,2014, the high court refused to disturb an appellate court ruling that said the law is unconstitutional. Then the U.S. Supreme Court ruled, February 25, 2014, that AZ cannot cut off family-planning funding to Planned Parenthood simply because the organization also provides abortions.

Clean Elections Commission: The commission went to court as the new law (H2593) scraps the current limit on what legislative candidates can take from political action committees. Individuals were giving $400 and now can give $4000.The court refused to block the higher cap on donations from taking effect. This could keep candidates from using the Clean Elections funds. On Oct. 15, 2013, the AZ Court of Appeals accepted special action on jurisdiction and granting relief, with opinion to follow. It also ordered Ken Bennett, in capacity of SoS office, from enforcing or implementing HB2593 pending further order of this court. On December 17, 1013, the AZ Supreme Court ruled that political candidates can accept much larger sums of money from donors.Candidates who run with private money can raise more than those who run with publicly financed money as this remains the same amount.

AZ Citizens Clean Elections Commission et al. v. Ken Bennett, et al. (CV2013-010338) will return to the Maricopa County Superior Court.

Arizona Ballots: SoS Ken Bennett is directing election officials to separate their 2014 federal election ballots from state and local races to keep those who cannot prove citizenship from voting in the latter. This would pertain to those citizens who have registered with the federal form.

Kris W. Kobach et al. v. United States Election Assistance Commission (13-4095-EFM-DJW)is suing the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC)to impose the two tier system based upon registration with the AZ voter registration form of the federal motor-voter form. The Judge, in his Order Remanding Matter to EAC for Final Agency Action gave the EAC until January 17, 2014 to respond to the order of the Court. The judge's order gives the interim executive director of the EAC authority to respond to the Court's order, but the only appropriate response for the executive director is to deny the request again to maintain the status quo. Whatever the district court in Kansas rules is likely to be appealed to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals.On January 17,2014, the Commission denied the state's request.

Independent Redistricting Commission: Leach et al v. AZ Independent Redistricting Commission (CV2012-007344), the legislature's challenge to the AIRC's congressional districts map, is proceeding in Maricopa County Superior Court. This is expected to go to trial in 2014. No action is currently pending.

Harris et al. v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission (CV-12-0894-PHX-ROS-NVW-RRC), the legislature's challenge to the AIRC state legislative districts map, was heard by a three judge panel of federal judges on March 22, 2013, and concluded on March 30, 2013. Supplemental briefs addressing the effect of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Shelby County v. Holder wrapped up on August 9. A decision is pending.

The primary filing deadline for candidates is May 28 so there should be a decision shortly on whether the 2012 maps will be used.

The legislature's challenge to the constitutionality of the voter-approved initiative creating the AZ Independent Redistricting Commission (AIRC) to determine election boundaries rather than the state legislature, Arizona State Legislature v. AZ Independent Redistricting Commission (CV12-01211-PHX-PGR). The oral argument was heard in U.S. District court on January 24, 2014. The court has not yet ruled.

CHECK THIS OUT

In the latest Morrison Institute Newsletter, Dr. David R. Berman, a senior research fellow at Morrison Institute for Public Policy, writes an interesting report about Arizona's longstanding belief in direct democracy.

In particular, Dr. Berman focuses on the never-ending dispute about signature collection and validation for getting initiatives/referendums on the ballot, including the use of paid vs. volunteer circulators. Suggestions for improving the system are provided.

Dr. Berman's report